The stop-what-you’re-doing principle March 7, 2007
Posted by Andreas in "The Economy", Environment, Politics, Society, Sustainable Living, rant.5 comments
We are busy destroying the world. Global warming, environmental decimation, pollution, wars without end, unsustainable extraction of non-renewable resources and species extinctions are wrecking our planet. This is not news. We all know this, but we seem incapable of stopping the carnage.
Now I don’t know about you, but if after naively experimenting with sticking my arm elbow-deep into a running meat mincer, I realised that I had made a potentially fatal mistake, my first reaction would not be to ask a doctor to give me an anaesthetic to numb the pain. Nor would I employ an engineer to design a fancy do-hickey that will make the meat grinder work at a more bearable speed and intensity.
My first reaction would be to pull my arm out of the mincer. I would simply stop whatever I was doing that was causing me pain. It’s the stop-what-your-doing principle. Its easy, cheap and has immediate effect.
So why don’t we just apply this simple principle to our current predicament regarding human-induced global mayhem and destruction? We know pretty much exactly how we are killing our environment – why don’t we simply stop what we’re doing, even just for a moment to think things over?
One of the reasons is that my arm-shredding analogy isn’t quite appropriate. In reality, we are more akin to the addict who knows that the substances he is imbibing and injecting are ruining his life and killing him. Of course, he is so psychologically and physiologically dependent on the stuff that he can’t imagine living without it.
The only real solution to the addict’s problems is to go cold turkey – to stop doing what he’s doing. We are addicted to oil and to consumption for the sake of consumption and to growing profits and to an ever expanding “economy” and those are ultimately the underlying reasons for the poor prognosis on the health of our planet.
Call me a Luddite, but I think what we should do is to stop what we’re doing at least to give ourselves the chance to reconsider our options.
I’m not saying that there aren’t possibly some “technological” solutions to some of our problems. Quite the opposite, human ingenuity and imagination will be crucial if we’re ever going to get ourselves out of this mess, but while the house is on fire, can we at least stop fanning the flames, please!?
Now I reckon its great that more and more of us eat organic food, use bicycles whenever possible and install energy saving light bulbs. That’s a start, but it’s not a final solution, because our dilemma is systemic.
We, not just as individuals, but as a society, as a civilisation, need to stop what we’re doing, because it’s the very basis of our way of life that’s at the heart of the problem. And yes, I am going to use the c-word here: capitalism is destroying the planet. Capitalism, the myth of endless growth, the commodification of everything, the globalisation of corporate empires, the military reach of the last remaining super-power, the belief in might-is-right and the political neutralisation of individuals and viable communities through a corrupt system of so-called representative so-called democracy.
Lets stop doing all that and talk about alternatives for a better world.
Quote de jeur #1 March 6, 2007
Posted by Andreas in "The Economy", Life, Politics, Quotes, Society.add a comment
True compassion is more than flinging a coin at a beggar; it comes to see that an edifice that produces beggars needs restructuring.
- Martin Luther King Jr.
So you wake up one day… March 5, 2007
Posted by Andreas in Life, Society, anarchism.add a comment
So you wake up one day and the monstrous twin towers of your mind are no more. They lie defeated in a smoldering heap of toxic rubble. The undergrowths of your psyche that have atrophied in their shadows from pre-school days as the twin’s tentaclaws wound themselves around your spinal cord appear bleached in the violent sunlight of the new morning. Bleached a translucent pale yellow – but not dead…
Yesterday you got up you went to school to ‘Varsity to work to drink to sleep to consume to fuck to make money to eat to shop to schnarf. Yesterday you were watching the world go by on your TV screen your computer monitor the pages of you magazine/schoolbook/textbook/chequebook/rulebook, on the other side of your windscreen/sunglasses/virtual reality goggles, in the eyes of your mother/banker/lover/boss/teacher/neighbour/favourite celebrity – a spectator of your own spectacular life.

[painting: Eric Drooker]
There’s got to be more than this !
Today you’ve broken through to the other side. You can see clearly now that the pain has gone. There’s more to life than just surviving in the urban jungle, or the rural desert, or the mind-numbing office cubicle, or the educational prison cell, or the dull hell of suburbia.
This may happen to you tomorrow or it might have happened to you before you learned how to read. Mind you, it might never happen to you at all. It might happen in an instant, like a brutal terrorist attack smashing into a glass-clad office high-rise, or gradually, like a massive edifice that collapses in on itself in slow-motion. It’s likely to happen in both ways – a gradual instant. (Oh, and, confusingly, this might happen to you more than once, in fact, it might happen constantly).
As you step across the threshold, cutting your naked feet on shattered crystal chandeliers, you may feel terrified or enthusiastic, relieved or scarred shitless. Whatever the case, take heart, there are more of us out here…and we’ve been looking for you !
Nuclear blogging March 3, 2007
Posted by Andreas in Nuclear Power, blogging.8 comments
Earlier this week, I managed to get my last anti-nuclear power post onto the “Your say” section of News24. I think this sort of cross-pollination from blogs to conventional web spaces can be quite fruitful.
I’m really keen to get people thinking and talking about issues that I feel pationate about, like nuclear power. It really doesn’t bother me if they don’t share all of my opinions as long as some sort of dialogue has been started in their heads and around their proverbial water coolers (not that we have many of those in SA, so maybe I should say “around their braai fires”). Exploring other avenues to get my stuff out into public spaces is definitely something I want to try to do more.
Getting the story onto News24 increased traffic to this blog substantially. I was a bit annoyed that the comments facility on the individual News24 contributions was disabled, making it much less interactive and open to immediate comments and responses.
Nonetheless, two people sent in lengthier replies to my initial rant. David Kritzinger
seems to be one of those nuclear energy supporters who think of themselves as environmentalists (or perhaps he is an environmentalist who’s turned to the dark side, I don’t know) , saying that we’re all really on the same side. Can’t say I agree – in my opinion, you cannot call yourself an environmentalist and support atomic energy.
Eelke de Boer from Botswana complained about my biased opinion and insisted on pointing out that renewable energy options are not perfect. It entirely slipped Eelkes mind to mention that nuclear power is, in fact, even less perfect.
Book Review: Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson March 2, 2007
Posted by Andreas in Book Reviews.3 comments
My rating: 7 out of 10 – visionary, fun and inspired.
I guess every sci-fi writer would like to think of him or herself as chronicling future history to some degree, predicting events in 50, 1000 or 250 000 years from now. Some of them actually get it right every now and then.
Jules Verne is the obvious example. He got a whole lot of things right in From the Earth to the Moon, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea and Around the World in Eighty Days, although his luck ran out when it comes to Journey to the Center of the Earth.
Considering recent developments in online gaming, Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash is a remarkable piece of future history that has actually become a reality during the author’s lifetime.
If you haven’t yet heard of internet-based “virtual world’s” such as Second Life, in which millions of internet users interact and “exist” in an imaginary parallel universe, you’ve probably been too pre-occupied with living your “first” life.
In Snow Crash, Stephenson describes something remarkably similar, called the “virtual Metaverse”, ten years before the precursor to Second Life was started (Snow Crash was first published in 1992). The parallels are fascinating.
In fact, it turns out that the creators of Second Life set out to develop a world inspired by Stephenson’s Metaverse and so the process of writing future history has actually been inverted in a sense: the sci-fi writer pre-figures and initiates the future rather than predicting it!
Just like Stephenson’s other novels, especially Cryptonomicon and the astonishing Baroque Cycle trilogy, Snow Crash is a brilliant read. It’s cyberpunk for the whole family. There’s intelligent science-fiction, teasing intimations of romantic entanglements, social and environmental mayhem and disintegration and, of course, a swashbuckling anti-hero to safe the world.
North America in the not too distant future is run by franchised mega-corporations and crime syndicates. National governments have all but ceased to exist.
When Hiro Protagonist (yes, that’s his name… his roomate’s called Vitaly Chernobyl!) is offered a mysterious cyber drug called snow crash, his deep suspicions lead him on a dangerous mission with devastating consequences. Hiro’s path soon crosses that of our heroine, Y.T., the skateboarding teenage pizza delivery girl with lots of balls. I love Stephenson’s penchant for deeply flawed yet likable male main characters and independent and gutsy female leads, and Snow Crash is no exception.
This is a fantastic book, even if you’re not normally into sci-fi. Read it!



