jump to navigation

National Day of Action Against Alcan May 7, 2007

Posted by Andreas in "The Economy", Coega, Environment, News, South Africa, Sustainable Living.
trackback

Here’s a press release from Earthlife Africa Johannesburg. If you are concerned about our environment, about South Africa’s energy future and about what’s going on at Coega, I suggest you should read it and support the day of action.

National Day of Action Against Alcan

On Wednesday the 9th of May 2007, social and environmental justice activists will demonstrate in Port Elizabeth, Johannesburg and Richards Bay against Alcan and its secret deal with Eskom. In Johannesburg, Earthlife Africa Jhb (ELA Jhb) will coordinate a protest outside Alcan’s head office. NiMBLE and other local groups will de demonstrating outside the Coega Development Corporation (CDC) in Port Elizabeth. In Richards Bay, Groundwork will be at Alcan’s local office. See below for addresses and times.

Culminating in 2006, Alcan was engaged in a lengthy negotiation with Eskom regarding the building of an aluminium smelter at Coega (in the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan area, outside of Port Elizabeth). The subject of this negotiation was the long-term purchasing of electricity from Eskom. Aluminium smelters are such intense energy users that plant location is determined by the price at which electricity is made available, rather than location of raw materials.

At the end of 2006, Alcan signed a series of deals with Eskom, the CDC, and Department of Trade and Industry. To date, none of these parties have answered detailed questions about their deals. In particular, the lack of disclosure regarding the price and possible resale of electricity is highly problematic, given Alcan’s history of buying subsidised electricity from governments and selling it back to the same governments at a profit.  

The Coega aluminium smelter will require around at least 1300MW of generation capacity and employ at most a thousand people (enough to power a city; currently, Eskom cannot ensure provisioned of a similar amount of power to the people of Cape Town). The power for the smelter will be heavily subsided (with tax-payer money) through the externalised costs of electricity generation, borne by society as a whole. This subsidy will be in addition to the R1.93 billion in tax-incentives already showered upon Coega. A reasonable estimate of the price of electricity granted to Alcan is around 15% of the price charged to Soweto residents (or about 5 cents per kilowatt hour). This would be substantively lower than the industry and residential average rates (16c and 29c per kwh respectively). This deal covers the next 25 years.

In response to civil society requests (Promotion of Access to Information Act applications) for information on the deal between it and Eskom, Alcan exploited loopholes in South African law, claiming that it would violate its trade, financial, and/or commercial interests. ELA Jhb first requested the Department of Public Enterprises to hold public consultation on the parameters of the deal early in 2005. The department and the Coega Development Corporation have refused to disclose information about their agreements. This ominous wall of silence on a long-term commitment with far-reaching impacts, from a supposedly transparent and accountable government, is reminiscent of Apartheid deals with foreign corporations.

Tristen Taylor, the Energy Policy Officer at Earthlife Africa Jhb, states, “The sale of electricity to Alcan is the sale of publicly produced assets. Given Eskom’s current inability to deliver enough electricity to business and citizens and the fact that 30% of the population is still without access to electricity, a 25-year firesale to Alcan hardly seems appropriate. If we were getting a good deal out of Alcan, why would they refuse to disclose it?”

Earthlife Africa Johannesburg demands that:

1) Alcan discloses details of its contract with the state-owned electricity company, Eskom, including prices, linkages to commodity prices, reselling of electricity provisions, and guarantees of supply.

2) Eskom and Alcan support transparent and accountable governance of state-owned enterprises and incentives to global capital.

3) Government implements its 1998 policy commitment to incorporate externalised costs in electricity prices (along with a commitment to provide free and adequate basic energy services to the poor).

4) All government departments disclose their agreements with Alcan and the CDC and urgently conduct and publish a comprehensive review of incentives, concessions and any other forms of subsidy to energy-intensive industries.

The list of questions put to Alcan, Eskom and government departments is available on request, as are background-briefing papers on the subject.

Details of protests on the 9th of May 2007:

Johannesburg: 2:30pm to 4:30pm

Place: Alcan National Office

Fredman Towers
13 Fredman Drive
Sandton

Port Elizabeth: 11:30am to 1:30pm

Place: Coega Development Corporation

Libra Chambers
Cnr Oakworth Road & Carnarvon Place
Humerail

Richards Bay: time to be determined

Place: Alcan’s Regional Office

4 Chloorking
Alton – Richards Bay

 

 

For more information, please contact:

 

Tristen Taylor

Energy Policy Officer

Earthlife Africa-Johannesburg Branch

Tel: +27 11 339 3662

Fax: +27 11 339 3270

Cell: +27 84 250 2434

Email: tristen@earthlife.org.za

www.earthlife.org.za

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Steve Hayes - May 8, 2007

So where can we get a copy of the press release?

Has it been posted in za.environment?

2. M Anderson - May 8, 2007

I would very much like to understand where you got the figure of 5c /kWhr from. I doubt even Greenland can produce it for that amount.

3. Andreas - May 8, 2007

I got the press release from Earthlife Africa directly.

4. Mukelani - May 8, 2007

“In response to civil society requests (Promotion of Access to Information Act applications) for information on the deal between it and Eskom, Alcan exploited loopholes in South African law, claiming that it would violate its trade, financial, and/or commercial interests. ”

The remark about “loopholes” is a bit inexact. The Right to Information is not an unlimited right, it is limited by other considerations such as privacy, national security and commercial confidentiality among others. Alcan & ESKOM are within their rights to use these exemptions in other to prevent disclosure of information that they believe may harm their commercial interests, however Earthlife is also within it’s rights to argue for a public interest override to these exemptions raised by Alcan & ESKOM in order to protect the public interest if the information shows that that deal between is illegal and/or harmful to the public good. The decision then becomes the Court’s to determine whether or not the information must be disclosed based on arguments on the public interest override.

This a common feature of most Access to Information laws through out the world and it therefore is incorrect to refer to the use of the commercial confidentiality exemption as a “loophole in the South African law”.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: